Industry Update

    Your DA Just Got Faster. Is Your Build Team Ready?

    NSW planning reforms commenced 21 March 2026. Here is what changed, and why it matters for your next project.

    Back to Resources

    Published 30 March 2026 · Allbuild Frames & Trusses

    According to the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, around 90% of development applications in NSW are for projects worth a million dollars or less. The reforms are intended to create a more proportionate, risk-based assessment system, with lower-risk development directed into faster pathways.

    On 21 March 2026, further provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Planning System Reforms) Act 2025 commenced. The short version: NSW is restructuring how DAs are assessed based on risk and complexity.

    What actually changed

    Minor modifications now have a 14-day statutory deadline.

    The reforms expand the streamlined minor-modification approach for modifications that do not have an environmental impact. Section 4.55A of the EP&A Act imposes a 14-day prescribed period for section 4.55(1) applications. If the consent authority does not decide within that period, it must not refuse the application. That is a statutory deadline, not administrative guidance.

    These applications now have a prescribed period where previously there was none. For builders, fewer delays between "approved with conditions" and "actually ready to build."

    A new fast-track pathway for lower-risk development.

    The Targeted Assessment Development (TAD) pathway is a new route under Division 4.3A of the EP&A Act. For eligible development, the TAD pathway may allow some assessment steps and considerations to be turned off. The government says the reforms could reduce assessment timeframes by up to 50% for eligible projects.

    Which projects qualify will be defined through future State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs). The Act says a SEPP may declare targeted assessment development, and official reform material states these must be publicly exhibited before they take effect.

    Complying development is expanding.

    The government has also released a Housing Pattern Book through NSW Planning, a guide for pre-endorsed low and mid-rise residential designs. Projects that align with these pre-endorsed designs are linked to fast-tracked approval pathways.

    The reforms also introduce prescribed timeframes for variation certificates. According to the official reform paper, determination windows of 10 to 20 days apply (depending on whether council is also assessing the CDC), with deemed approval if no response is given within the set timeframe. Note: we have not independently confirmed the exact operative in-force clause for this provision.

    What it means if you are building in NSW

    These reforms are designed to compress the pipeline between DA lodgement and construction approval, particularly for residential work.

    That is good news for builders who plan ahead. But it also means the window between "approved" and "when do you need frames on site" could get tighter. That is our read on it, not a legal claim.

    When timelines compress, the builds that go smoothest are the ones where coordination happened early. Where someone checked the structural drawings against the architectural set before quoting. Where revision mismatches got caught before materials were ordered, not after.

    The bottom line

    Faster approval pathways are now in the legislation. For builders who have their supply chain sorted and their coordination locked in early, this is a genuine advantage.

    If you have got a project in the pipeline, talk to us early. The earlier we are across the drawings, the faster we can move when you need us to.

    General information only. This article summarises provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Planning System Reforms) Act 2025 as commenced 21 March 2026. It is not legal advice. Verify current requirements with your certifier or local council. Allbuild's review is a buildability and coordination check — final structural responsibility remains with the engineer of record.

    Need Help With Your Next Project?

    We track the standards so you don't have to. Talk to us about your next build.